Article
Your client finished the program. Now what?
The program is done, the client is happy and says thank you. This is where many coaches let them go. Here is what research says usually happens next, and why a lighter alumni membership can help your client and your business.
Published 5 Oct 2026 · Written by Trainda
You know the moment. Your client has put in three months of work. They have lost weight, training is a habit and meals are under control. In the last check-in they thank you and say they will take it from here. Six months later a message arrives: the old habits are back, and so are some of the kilos. Could they start over?
That is not your failure or theirs. It is how most programs end.
Regain is the rule, not the exception
A meta-analysis of 29 US weight-loss programs, each following people for at least two years, found that after an ordinary calorie-reduced diet people kept only 17% of the weight they had lost five years on (Anderson et al. 2001). A later review sums up the same data: more than half of lost weight comes back within two years, and more than 80% within five (Hall and Kahan 2018).
Exercise follows the same curve. At one gym in Brazil, 63% of new members quit before their third month, and fewer than 4% trained without a break for more than a year (Sperandei et al. 2016), though none of them had a coach. Across 62 trials of activity programs, the effects shrank over time, and there was little evidence they lasted beyond 15 months (Murray et al. 2017).
None of this means the program was wasted. In a review of 124 trials, gains in blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugar were still there five years after the program ended, fading as weight came back (Hartmann-Boyce et al. 2023). The slower the regain, the longer the benefit lasts.
Staying in touch helps, modestly
So what helps? Something simple: the contact does not stop.
In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, people who got continued support after a weight-loss program kept off about 3.2 kg more over the next year and a half than people who were left on their own, and the result held across studies (Middleton et al. 2012). A larger review of 45 randomised trials gives a more cautious number: maintenance programs covering food and activity cut regain by 1.56 kg at one year (Dombrowski et al. 2014). The authors call the benefit small but significant.
Tell your clients exactly that. An alumni membership will not hold off every kilo. It slows the slide back, and that is worth a lot. An honest promise earns more trust than a big one.
How you stay in touch matters too. In one trial, maintenance delivered online did no better on average than newsletters alone, while face-to-face meetings did (Wing et al. 2006). In another, follow-up calls every two weeks worked as well as meetings: people regained 1.2 kg in a year, against 3.7 kg for those who only got newsletters (Perri et al. 2008). Remote contact works when it is real contact with a coach, not just content. And a review of 29 trials found that programs whose results lasted had something in common: they kept prompting people after the program ended (Fjeldsoe et al. 2011).
What an alumni membership looks like
Nobody has tested a cheaper alumni tier as such. It is a way of applying the findings above: keep the contact, but lighter and cheaper than 1:1 coaching.
In practice it might include:
- a community where former clients keep working on the same goals
- scheduled posts, such as a weekly nudge, a monthly theme or a seasonal training tip
- a regular slot when you answer questions yourself
- a monthly price well below your 1:1 coaching.
The third point matters most. The research favours memberships with real coach contact over a content library.
Be just as clear about what is not included. Personal programming and one-to-one messaging stay in 1:1 coaching. That keeps the membership light for you to run, keeps the difference obvious to the client, and protects the value of your 1:1 work.
When to offer it, and when not to
Offer the membership at a natural turning point: when the program ends, or when a client tells you they are leaving. At that moment the alternative is not more 1:1 coaching. It is losing the client altogether.
Do not offer it as a cheaper option to clients who were not planning to leave. In a field experiment at a South American mobile operator, customers who were proactively told about a cheaper plan cancelled more often than customers who got no such offer (Ascarza et al. 2016). The researchers' explanation: the nudge made people rethink what they were spending. The same can happen in coaching.
How to bring it up
Raise it in the last weeks of the program, when you review what the client has achieved. Something like:
"You've done great work. The research says results last best when contact with a coach doesn't stop completely after a program. So I have a lighter membership for clients who finish: the community, weekly posts and a place to ask me questions, for much less than 1:1 coaching. Want to hear more?"
Say the price plainly and let them decide in their own time. If they say no, wish them well and tell them the door is open. Pressure spends the trust that three months of work built.
What you gain
First, the money: the membership is monthly income from clients who would otherwise leave altogether. On top of that, you get two more gains.
Your client keeps training with a plan. The membership holds a few ready programs for different needs, and the client follows the one that fits their situation. They are not left with nothing, and you do not build a new program by hand for each of them.
You stay in touch. When the client wants a new goal six months on, a race or another round, they already know you and see your work every week. The next 1:1 round starts with one message, not with cold marketing.
How to do it in Trainda
- Run an ongoing alumni group. Make the membership a group coaching that keeps running. A client who finishes their program joins the group already under way.
- Sell it as a subscription. Bill monthly, quarterly or yearly, with payments going to your own Stripe account.
- Give the group tracks. Tracks are alternative programs inside one coaching, such as home and gym training, or maintenance and a new goal. The client picks the track that fits, or a questionnaire you build picks it from their answers. When their needs change, they can move to another track.
- Schedule your posts. Write a month of posts in one sitting and give each a publication date and time.
- Split the community into topic areas. For example questions for the coach, open discussion and weekly wins. Choose which topic areas bring posts to the home page of your coach dashboard to answer. You see questions straight away, and the open discussion never buries you.
The next time a client thanks you and says they will take it from here, you will have something to offer them.
Sources
- Anderson JW, Konz EC, Frederich RC, Wood CL (2001). Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
- Ascarza E, Iyengar R, Schleicher M (2016). The perils of proactive churn prevention using plan recommendations: evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research.
- Dombrowski SU, Knittle K, Avenell A, Araújo-Soares V, Sniehotta FF (2014). Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ.
- Fjeldsoe B, Neuhaus M, Winkler E, Eakin E (2011). Systematic review of maintenance of behavior change following physical activity and dietary interventions. Health Psychology.
- Hall KD, Kahan S (2018). Maintenance of lost weight and long-term management of obesity. Medical Clinics of North America.
- Hartmann-Boyce J, Theodoulou A, Oke JL, et al. (2023). Long-term effect of weight regain following behavioral weight management programs on cardiometabolic disease incidence and risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.
- Middleton KMR, Patidar SM, Perri MG (2012). The impact of extended care on the long-term maintenance of weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews.
- Murray JM, Brennan SF, French DP, et al. (2017). Effectiveness of physical activity interventions in achieving behaviour change maintenance in young and middle aged adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine.
- Perri MG, Limacher MC, Durning PE, et al. (2008). Extended-care programs for weight management in rural communities: the TOURS randomized trial. Archives of Internal Medicine.
- Sperandei S, Vieira MC, Reis AC (2016). Adherence to physical activity in an unsupervised setting: explanatory variables for high attrition rates among fitness center members. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport.
- Wing RR, Tate DF, Gorin AA, Raynor HA, Fava JL (2006). A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. New England Journal of Medicine.